My last day at the ISNET-3 workshop also featured my talk. I was happy enough with how I presented what I presented, though I can't help feel that the audience would have been more interested in what I said if I had performed a more sophisticated analysis of my calculations... which I guess is the point of the workshop. The lesson, I think, is that accepting invitations to too many workshops is not consistent with having time to do lots of calculations, especially if one does not have a large team of postdocs and students behind you. On the other hand, I had three separate discussions which led to plans to collaborate on some different projects -- on on the link between fusion cross-sections and the nuclear equation of state, one on fission and another on giant resonances. Now to do the necessary calculations.
Here are some calculations I presented in my talk today. They show a case in which varying model parameters can give different outcomes. In this case, the parameters is the size of the space in which I perform my calculations, with all other physics input the same. The result is that in one case we get fusion, and in another not. That's sort of bad, in that we don't want things to depend on technical details of calculations, but usually we can't completely avoid it, and at least we should better map out where the are such issues.